Context and criticism
Literature in English · WAEC and JAMB · SS2 and SS3
The syllabus sets African and non-African texts side by side, and the better answers can explain how the circumstances of a work shape its meaning without turning literature into history. Critical opinion is useful only when you apply it to a specific moment in the text.
What you need to know
- You are examined on both African and non-African literature, so you must be able to move between them. Expect questions that assume knowledge of the concerns and forms of each, and never offer a text from the wrong section, which scores zero regardless of quality.
- The recurring concerns of modern African literature include the colonial encounter, independence and the disillusionment that followed, the pull between tradition and modernity, corruption and misrule, the position of women, migration and exile, and the claims of the community on the individual.
- African oral tradition supplies much of the technique as well as the subject matter: the proverb, the folktale, the praise poem, the dirge, the riddle, the song, call and response, and the figure of the storyteller or griot who addresses listeners directly.
- Written African literature absorbs those oral forms rather than abandoning them, so a novel may carry proverbs as a form of argument, a play may open with drumming and a chorus, and a poem may be built on the shape of a lament. When you identify such a feature, say what it imports: communal judgement, inherited wisdom, or the authority of the ancestors.
- A proverb in a text is doing more than ornamenting speech. It lets an older character settle an argument by appealing to shared wisdom, and when a younger character cannot answer in kind, the writer is showing the tradition losing its grip.
- Historical context changes what a work means. A play written under a military government reads as protest even where it never names the government; poetry written in the independence years carries hope that later writing deliberately withholds. Date the work, then ask what it could not say openly.
- Social context covers class, gender roles, religion, education and the economy of the world depicted. These determine what is possible for a character, which is why a decision that looks like weakness may be the only move available within that society.
- Context must serve the text. One or two sentences establishing circumstance, then straight back to incident, language and effect. An essay that spends half its length on history has stopped being a literature answer.
- For non-African texts, know the conventions of the period. Shakespeare's theatre played in daylight to a standing crowd, with little scenery, boys in the women's roles, and language carrying the work that scenery does now, which is why descriptions of place appear inside the dialogue.
- Romantic poetry values nature, feeling, imagination and the individual voice, often against industrial society. Modernist writing fragments form, distrusts straightforward narration and leaves meaning for the reader to assemble. Knowing the convention tells you whether a feature is a choice or simply the norm of the period.
- Resist treating African texts only as social documents and non-African texts only as art. Ambition, jealousy, grief and love run through both, and the strongest comparative answers show a shared human concern handled through different forms.
- Criticism is the organised discussion of literature, and the main approaches you may meet are formalist or practical criticism, which reads the text closely on its own terms; feminist criticism, which examines how women are represented and by whom; Marxist criticism, which reads class and economic power; and post-colonial criticism, which examines empire, language and who is permitted to speak.
- Use a critical opinion in three steps: state it briefly, apply it to a named moment in the text, then agree, qualify or disagree with your own evidence. A critic's name dropped into a paragraph without application adds nothing and often looks like padding.
- Your own reading, argued from the text, is worth more than a borrowed one recited. Examiners reward independent judgement supported by evidence, and they recognise crammed critical phrases immediately. The author's biography is not evidence; the text is.
Key terms
- Oral tradition
- The body of stories, proverbs, songs and poetry transmitted by word of mouth across generations, and the performance conventions that go with it.
- Context
- The historical, social and cultural circumstances in which a work was produced and which shape its meaning.
- Post-colonial criticism
- An approach that examines how literature represents empire, colonised peoples, language and cultural power.
- Feminist criticism
- An approach that examines the representation of women and the operation of gender in a text and in its reception.
- Practical criticism
- Close reading of a text on its own terms, concentrating on language, structure and effect rather than outside information.
- Canon
- The body of works conventionally regarded as the most important in a literary tradition.
- Universality
- The quality by which a work speaks to readers beyond the time and place that produced it.
Worked examples
Rewrite this parroted sentence so that the critical opinion is properly used: 'Critics have said that the novel is a tragedy of a man destroyed by change.'
- Diagnose the fault. The sentence names an opinion in general terms, attaches it to nothing in the text, and is followed by no judgement of your own.
- Attach it to a specific moment. Choose one incident where change is clearly what defeats the character.
- Decide your own position: full agreement, partial agreement, or disagreement. Partial agreement is usually the most defensible and shows independent reading.
- Rebuild in three moves: state the view compactly, apply it to the incident, then qualify it with evidence.
- Keep the critic subordinate to your argument, so that the paragraph remains yours.
Answer: Used version: the common reading of the novel as the tragedy of a man destroyed by change holds in the final confrontation, where the protagonist's authority counts for nothing before the new administration. It is only half the truth, though, since the same inflexibility that the new order exposes had already isolated him from his own household long before the administration arrived.
Plan an answer to: how far does the historical setting of a work you have studied determine the fate of its central character?
- Notice the task phrase how far, which requires a judgement of degree, so a plan that only argues one side cannot score in the top band.
- Establish the historical circumstance in two sentences: the period, the power arrangement, and what it makes impossible for the character.
- Plan two paragraphs for the side that history determines the outcome, each anchored to a specific incident where an outside force overrides the character's choice.
- Plan one paragraph for the other side, where the character's own temperament or decision contributes, which is what the words how far are inviting.
- Reach a judgement rather than sitting on the fence, for example that history sets the trap while character decides how the character walks into it.
- Conclude by returning to the words how far and stating the proportion you have argued for.
Answer: A four-paragraph plan: two paragraphs showing historical forces overriding the character's choices, one paragraph showing personal temperament contributing, and a conclusion that answers how far by judging history as the condition and character as the trigger.
The mistake to avoid
Writing a history or culture essay with a few character names dropped in. Context is worth a sentence or two at a time, always returning to what happens in the text and how it is written. The second trap is reciting a memorised critical quotation without applying it; examiners see hundreds of the same line each year and award nothing for any of them.
In the exam
Give the context early and briefly, then let it do its work inside the analysis rather than in a separate block. When a question invites comparison across traditions, organise by idea and not by text, so that each paragraph handles one concern in both works instead of covering one book and then the other. If you use a critical view, apply it to a named incident in the same sentence or the one after, or leave it out.